Businessweek.com, here.
Friday, September 30, 2011
EU COMPETITION LAW - ENFORCEMENT ELEMENTS FOR A DISCUSSION ON EFFECTIVENESS AND UNIFORMITY
L. Ortiz Blanco, A. Lamadrid de Pablo, here.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Abuse of Collective Dominance Under the Competition Law of the Russian Federation
S. Avdasheva, N. Goreyko, R. Pittman, here.
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
On patent infringement by farmers planting the progeny of genetically altered seeds covered by U.S. patents
MONSANTO COMPANY AND MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC v. VERNON HUGH BOWMAN, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2010-1068, here.
Monday, September 26, 2011
US Seventh Circuit court of appeals on FTAIA’s limits on the Sherman Act’s reach
MINN-CHEM, INCORPORATED, et al., v. AGRIUM INCORPORATED, et al., No. 10-1712, here.
POTENTIAL PRO-COMPETITIVE AND ANTICOMPETITIVE ASPECTS OF TRADE/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS
OECD, Secretariat's Background Note, here.
Sunday, September 25, 2011
Friday, September 23, 2011
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Monday, September 19, 2011
USTR White Paper On Trade In Medicines Raises Questions
Intellectual Property Watch http://bit.ly/oIytB8.
Recidivism Eliminated: Cartel Enforcement in the United States Since 1999
G. Werden , S. Hammond, B. Barnett, http://bit.ly/pWK0WK.
Friday, September 16, 2011
Google and IBM do it again: Google Acquires over 1,000 Patents from IBM in August
SEO by the Sea http://bit.ly/niVXM5.
The Interaction of Leniency Programmes and Actions for Damages
C. Cauffman, http://bit.ly/pR6ZSR (p. 181).
Universal / Deezer : le droit de la concurrence au dessus du droit d’auteur
Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, Ordonnance de référé 05 septembre 2011, ici (Legalis.net).
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Koninklijke Grolsch NV v Commission: failure to explain the reasons why the conduct of a subsidiary is attributed to the parent company
General Court of the European Union, Case T-234/07, here.
The Right Thing - An authors’ rights handbook for journalists
International Federation of Journalists, here.
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
RESOURCE PACKET ON ORPHAN WORKS: LEGAL AND POLICY ISSUES FOR RESEARCH LIBRARIES
Association of Research Libraries, here.
Urteil im Geschmacksmuster-Rechtsstreit zwischen den Firmen Apple und Samsung
Landgericht Düsseldorf, 09.09.2011, 14c O 194/11, hier.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Monday, September 12, 2011
Addressing Standards Creation: Divergence or Convergence Across the Atlantic?
T. Vinje, A. Van Rooijen and T.Cornell, here.
Thursday, September 08, 2011
Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Monday, September 05, 2011
China’s Anti-Monopoly Law: What is the Welfare Standard?
P. Shan, G. Tan; S. Wilkie, M. Williams, here.
Thursday, September 01, 2011
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Going It Alone: The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement as a Sole Executive Agreement
O. Hathaway and A. Kapczynski, here.
Monday, August 29, 2011
Friday, August 19, 2011
Thursday, August 18, 2011
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Class of indirect purchasers of a generic certified
RE WELLBUTRIN XL ANTITRUST LITIGATION, NO. 08-2433 here.
Assessment of CETA IPR Chapter
Final Report for the EU‐Canada Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) on the EU‐Canada
Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, here, p. 319 ff.
Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, here, p. 319 ff.
Abuse of Dominance in the residential real estate market in India
Competition Commission of India, Belaire Owner's Association vs DLF Limited and HUDA, here.
First sale doctrine and copies manufactured outside the U.S.
John Wiley & Sons v. Kirtsaeng, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, Docket No. 09-4896-cv, here.
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Monday, August 15, 2011
Friday, August 12, 2011
On the meaning of research in fair dealing under the Canadian Copyright Act
THE FEDERATION OF LAW SOCIETIES OF CANADA and CANADIAN LEGAL
INFORMATION INSTITUTE/INSTITUT CANADIEN D’INFORMATION JURIDIQUE, Interveners, SOCAN v. Bell et al., here.
INFORMATION INSTITUTE/INSTITUT CANADIEN D’INFORMATION JURIDIQUE, Interveners, SOCAN v. Bell et al., here.
L’Oréal v. eBay: The Court of Justice of the European Union Tightens Liability of Online Marketplace Operators
I. Bhattacharya, G. Wunsch, M. Saarinen, L. Cohen, here.
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
Tuesday, August 09, 2011
Monday, August 08, 2011
Friday, August 05, 2011
Thursday, August 04, 2011
Perfect 10 Legal Saga: Court of Appeals on the request for preliminary injunctive relief
PERFECT 10, INC., v. GOOGLE, INC., here (from SCRIBD)
Wednesday, August 03, 2011
Tuesday, August 02, 2011
THE ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT ( ACTA): AN ASSESSMENT
Study requested by the European Parliament's Committee on International Trade, here.
Flash Cookies and Privacy II: Now with HTML5 and ETag Respawning
M. Ayenson, D. Wambach, A. Soltani, N. Good, C. Hoofnagle, here.
Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Tuesday, July 05, 2011
Australia’s approach to expert evidence in competition law cases
The Hot Tub, Video released by the University of Melbourne Competition Law & Economics Network (CLEN), here.
Monday, July 04, 2011
ECJ on public lending and the amount of remuneration
Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auteurs (VEWA) v Belgische Staat, Case C‑271/10, 30 June 2011, here.
Friday, July 01, 2011
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
BGH: Kartellteilnehmer haften auch mittelbar Geschädigten auf Schadensersatz
Urteil des Kartellsenats vom 28.6.2011 - KZR 75/10, Pressemitteilung.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
SCCR 22: Conclusions
Here. On Limitations and Exceptions, Persons with print and other reading disabilities:
"(....)
4. Following further discussion, the Committee asked the Chair to prepare a Chair’s text for an international instrument on limitations and exceptions for persons with print disabilities (document SCCR/22/16), which would constitute the basis for the future text-based work to be undertaken by the Committee in its 23rd session.
5. The Committee agreed to recommend to the WIPO General Assembly that Members of the Committee continue discussions regarding the Chair’s document SCCR/22/16 with the aim to agree and finalize a proposal on an international instrument on limitations and exceptions for persons with print disabilities in the 23rd session of the SCCR, in accordance with the timetable adopted at the 21st session of the SCCR.
6. The Committee encouraged the stakeholders to continue the work of the
Stakeholders’ Platform."
5. The Committee agreed to recommend to the WIPO General Assembly that Members of the Committee continue discussions regarding the Chair’s document SCCR/22/16 with the aim to agree and finalize a proposal on an international instrument on limitations and exceptions for persons with print disabilities in the 23rd session of the SCCR, in accordance with the timetable adopted at the 21st session of the SCCR.
6. The Committee encouraged the stakeholders to continue the work of the
Stakeholders’ Platform."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Full of amazing panels, you just have to watch them all - over the coming weeks and months, also because they'll even get better with ti...
-
M. Vestager, here . Letta Report here . Draghi's Géopolitiques Article here .
-
Video soon available here .
-
ECA, video here
-
Grüne im Bundestag, Video hier .