Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from April, 2012

Department of National Defence Uses Crown Copyright To Demand Removal of Leaked Document

Michaelgeist.ca, here

AU Federal Court on "time shifting"

National Rugby League Investments Pty Limited v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 59, here

Harmonizing Patent Law: The Untamable Union Patent

H. Ullrich, here

Informe sobre los Colegios Profesionales tras la transposición de la Directiva de Servicios

CNC, aquí.

Private actions in UK competition law: a consultation on options for reform

BIS, here

Berners-Lee: “Daten sind wie Dynamit”

Silicon.de, hier.

The UsedSoft case – exhaustion online

T. Targosz, here

Das Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz – Erfahrungen und Ausblick

H. Bardt, J. Niehues, H. Techert, hier

World Intellectual Property Day 2012: Map of the Activities

Here

AstraZeneca and the EU Sector Inquiry: When Do Patent Filings Violate Competition Law?

J. Drexl, here

Deutscher Journalisten-Verband zum Urheberrecht in der digitalen Gesellschaft

Hier

Saving the game: Why preserving video games is illegal

Thenextweb.com, here

“Pfleiderer ” goes Austria – OLG Wien

Kartellblog.de, hier

Big Data age puts privacy in question as information becomes currency

Guardian.co.uk, here

Nutzerinteressen stärken, Urheberrechte wahren

Deutscher Bibliotheksverband, hier

GEMA vs YouTube - what the Hamburg court really said...

Ipkitten.blogspot.com, here

International Competition Network Launches New Initiatives on the Investigative Process, Enforcement Cooperation, and Working with the Courts

FTC, here

Bundesregierung setzt auf Open Data

Heise.de, hier

Norwegian Competition Authority against fixed book price law

Press release, here

Oracle/Google: Rumble in the Java jungle

The Economist, here. On tech issues behind the legal dispute read also here (from news.cnet.com)

AU High Court rules in favour of iiNet

Summary here; judgment here

Turning Smartphones into Mobile Wallets – What Are the Issues?

Techpolicy.com, here.

Control of Museum Art Images: The Reach and Limits of Copyright and Licensing

K. Crews, M. Brown, here

College Faculty Continue Their Love Affair with Print Textbooks

BISG, here

Patents into ploughshares

The Economist, here

What does it mean to be open online?

N. Kroes, here

Más reflexiones sobre la declaración de servicio público de las rutas aéreas… ahora, de Canarias….

Fedeablogs.net, aquì

British Airways to pay £58.5 million penalty in OFT fuel surcharge decision

OFT, here.

Don't let software patents stop us standing on the shoulders of giants

J. Zittrain, here

International cooperation to fight protectionism

J. Almunia, here

UEFA’s Battle for its Brand

F. Gindrat, here

Twitter promotes patent peace with Innovator’s Agreement

Paidcontent.org, here

The value of future damages claims in energy: proven, probable or possible?

OXERA, here

Innovation in EU merger control: walking the talk

R. Veugelers, here

Access Copyright signs Model Licence with the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada

Ifrro.org, here. Read also this comment by M. Geist and this other one by A.Katz.

Google target of new federal privacy probe (Safari)

Mercurynews.com, here

Bundesliga weiter in der „Sportschau“ und bei Sky

Faz.net, hier

DA FUSIONE ALITALIA-AIRONE MONOPOLIO SULLA ROTTA LINATE-FIUMICINO. NOVANTA GIORNI DI TEMPO PER PRESENTARE LE MISURE UTILI A RIMUOVERE TALE POSIZIONE ENTRO IL 28 OTTOBRE 2012

Provvedimento qui

Technology Regulation

Panel at Stanford University, video here.
• Prof. Richard Epstein, New York University School of Law
• Prof. Anthony Falzone, Stanford Center for Internet and Society
• Prof. Mark Lemley, Stanford Law School
• Mr. Peter Thiel, President, Clarium Capital
• Hon. Ted Ullyot, General Counsel, Facebook
• Moderator: Dean Larry Kramer, Stanford Law School.

Viacom v. YouTube

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, Docket No. 10-3270-cv.